A local court in Ajmer, Rajasthan, on Wednesday sent notices to the Union Ministry of Minority Affairs, the Archaeological Survey of India, and the Ajmer Dargah Committee regarding a petition seeking a survey of the renowned Ajmer Sharif Dargah, even as Sambhal district in Uttar Pradesh remains tense after a court-ordered survey of the Shahi Jama Masjid there.
Vishnu Gupta, the leader of the Hindu Sena, filed the petition, claiming that there existed a temple in Ajmer Sharif Dargah similar to those “in Kashi and Mathura.”
Following Gupta’s contention in his petition that the dargah, the shrine of Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, was a Shiva temple, civil judge Manmohan Chandel issued notifications. The court order has not yet been shared with the petitioners or posted online.
“The court asked us why we are filing it. We told the court everything and after listening to us earnestly, the court issued notice to the concerned parties once it was satisfied,” Gupta told.
He claimed that Har Bilas Sarda, “who held an important position during British Rule, wrote in 1910 about the presence of a Hindu temple”.
According to Gupta, in one of his books, Sarda, a judge, politician and an academic, wrote about the dargah: “Tradition says that inside the cellar is the image of Mahadeva in a temple, on which sandal used to be placed every day by a Brahmin family still maintained by the dargah as gharyali (bell striker)”.
“There are roads in Ajmer named after Sarda, so we said that the court should take his words seriously, that at least a survey should be done so that the truth comes out,” Gupta said, claiming that “the Ajmer structure was constructed after demolishing Hindu and Jain temples”.
“Locals say that as recently as 50 years ago, a priest used to pray there, and there used to be shivling too, which was moved to the basement. So, a survey should be done so that everyone becomes clear,” he said, while citing other “evidences”.
He claimed that his outfit wanted the dargah to be declared a Hindu temple “and if it has a registration, it should be cancelled, an ASI survey should be conducted, and that we should be permitted to pray”.
Ajmer Dargah will observe its 813th Urs in January next year. About this, Gupta said, “Chishti saheb wasn’t born here and he wasn’t from here. So, who was here before him? Prithviraj Chauhan. And the city was known as Ajaymeru.”
Syed Sarwar Chishty, secretary of Anjuman Syed Zadgan — a body of Dargah caretakers – said: “We swallowed a bitter pill after Babri Masjid and accepted it in the interest of the nation, believing that something like that won’t repeat. But Kashi, Mathura, Sambhal … it refuses to stop. On June 22, (RSS chief) Mohan Bhagwat had said that people shouldn’t look for a Shivling in every mosque.” Chishty said that “it is the fault of retired Chief Justice of India Justice D Y Chandrachud” for the recent flurry of cases.
“The Dargah is a symbol of communal harmony, diversity and pluralism. It promotes unity in diversity and there are crores of followers of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti across the world… Such things are not in the interest of the nation,” he said.
In September, when the case was first transferred to the current court, he had said, “This is not a joke that every other day criminals come forward with a new claim. In 2007, a man named Bhavesh Patel was arrested in a bomb blast in the dargah… The dargah has been a place of worship for all religions and it will remain such.”
The case’s next hearing is scheduled for December 20. This occurs one week after the Bhajan Lal Sharma administration of Rajasthan renamed the Hotel Khadim in Ajmer, which is a project of the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, as Ajaymeru. Assembly Speaker Vasudev Devnani, an MLA from Ajmer North, had campaigned for the name change, arguing that Ajmer was known as Ajaymeru during the time of Rajasthan’s warrior king Prithviraj Chauhan in the 12th century and that this is how it was referred to in old Indian literature and history books.
In response to a plea that the Shahi Jama Masjid was constructed on the site of a Hindu temple, a Sambhal district court last week ordered a survey of the structure. This is similar to claims made in the cases of Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, the Shahi Idgah in Mathura, and the Kamal-Maula mosque in Madhya Pradesh’s Dhar.
